Antecedent water condition determines carbon exchange response to extreme precipitation events across global drylands
编号:1446
稿件编号:1122 访问权限:仅限参会人
更新:2021-06-16 09:56:17 浏览:1087次
口头报告
摘要
The global hydrological cycle is predicted to be intensified under the warming climate, with more extreme precipitation events and longer dry spell in between. Here, we evaluated how extreme precipitation events (EPEs) with antecedent dry (dry-EPEs) and wet (wet-EPEs) water conditions influence carbon exchange along gradient of arid, semi-arid and sub-humid ecosystems based on eddy covariance datasets. After EPEs, ecosystem respiration (Re) and gross primary productivity (GPP) were stimulated by pulses of soil moisture in arid and semi-arid regions, but suppressed by decreased soil temperature in sub-humid region. Antecedent water condition determined asynchronous response of Re and GPP to EPEs, and therefore fluctuations in net carbon balance. Net carbon uptake capacity was enhanced immediately following wet-EPEs because of more rapid and greater response of GPP than Re. However, after dry-EPEs, net carbon uptake capacity decreased immediately and increased thereafter because the response of GPP to dry-EPEs lagged behind Re. More antecedent precipitation further stimulated accumulative net carbon uptake. Along the aridity gradient, duration and magnitude of net carbon release were greater in wetter regions than that in drier regions after dry-EPEs, while net carbon uptake duration was shorter in wetter regions after wet-EPEs. The accumulative net carbon uptake after EPEs decreased with increasing aridity index, indicating that net carbon uptake capacity in drier regions benefited more from EPEs. We concluded that antecedent water conditions and local climate regimes need to be considered when interpreting the response of carbon exchange to EPEs in dryland ecosystems.
关键字
dryland,aridity gradient,carbon exchange,extreme precipitation,antecedent water condition,soil moisture
稿件作者
赵卉忱
中国科学院大气物理研究所
徐希燕
中国科学院大气物理研究所
贾根锁
中国科学院大气物理研究所
张安治
中国科学院大气物理研究所
王鹤松
中国科学院大气物理研究所
发表评论