Evaluating the Effect of Ambient Concentrations, Route Choices, and Environmental (in)Justice on Students’Dose of Ambient NO2 While Walking to School at Population Scales
编号:1798 稿件编号:1684 访问权限:仅限参会人 更新:2021-06-16 15:36:48 浏览:678次 口头报告

报告开始:2021年07月11日 11:48 (Asia/Shanghai)

报告时间:3min

所在会议:[S12B] 12B、气溶胶与大气环境科学 » [S12B-2] 专题12.3 大气污染暴露与健康风险

暂无文件

摘要
The commuting microenvironment accounts for a large part of students’ diurnal exposure to air pollution, especially in cities in developed countries where air pollution is caused predominantly by vehicle traffic. Accurate quantification of students’ exposure and pollution dose during their commute from home to school requires their home addresses and details of the schools they attend. Such details are usually inaccessible or difficult to obtain at population scales due to privacy issues. Therefore, estimates of students’ exposure to, and dose of, air pollution at population scales have to rely on simulated origins and destinations, which may bias the results. This contribution overcomes this limitation by quantifying students’ terrain-based dosage of ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) during their commute from home to school while walking along (a) the shortest-distance routes and (b) an alternative lowest-dose route. This is determined at population scales for students in Auckland, New Zealand using a rich dataset of observed home addresses and schools attended for 14,091 walking students. This study also determines the bias introduced when using simulated addresses (as opposed to observed data) to calculate the same result. Finally, we examine exposure inequalities among students of different socioeconomic backgrounds at school, at home, and during walking commutes. Results show that only 17.48% of students in the whole of Auckland can find alternative lowest-dose routes. The portion is higher (26%) in central Auckland because of its better road network connectivity. The trade-off analysis identifies that for only about 30% of students, a 1% increase in route length is associated with a >1% reduction in dosage if using the alternative lowest-dose route. Greater benefits were observed in suburban Auckland (a less-polluted area) than in central Auckland, which highlights the importance of taking an alternative lowest-dose route, especially for students whose shortest-distance routes overlap with or run parallel to an arterial road. The use of simulated addresses resulted in underestimates of both the length and reduced dosage of the alternative routes by up to a quarter in comparison with the results derived from the observed data. Limited evidence of exposure inequality based on commuter exposure was found, but patterns in the central city were opposite to those in the suburbs.
关键字
NO2 dose;,Route Choices,Schoolchildren
报告人
马绪瀛
西安科技大学测绘学院

稿件作者
马绪瀛 西安科技大学测绘学院
发表评论
验证码 看不清楚,更换一张
全部评论
登录 会议管理 酒店预订 提交摘要